The Reduction of the Father

A core problem with later Trinitarian framing is that it re-labels the Father: instead of “God” meaning the Father Himself (as Scripture overwhelmingly speaks), “God” becomes a category shared by three co-equal persons—so the Father is functionally reduced from being the one true God to being one person within God.

Yet the Bible’s ordinary, consistent usage is simpler:

  • God = the Father

  • YHWH = the one God

  • Jesus = the one sent, the revealer, the image/temple in whom God is made known

That isn’t “denigrating” the Son; it is exactly how the text itself presents the relationship.


1) In the Old Testament, the “one God” is YHWH—and He is called Father

The Old Testament is relentless: there is one God, and His covenant name is YHWH (יהוה).

  • YHWH identifies His name: Exodus 3:15.

  • YHWH alone is God (Isaiah’s repeated polemic): e.g., Isaiah 43:10–11; 44:6–8; 45:5–6.

And this one God—YHWH—is also explicitly called Father of His people:

  • Deuteronomy 32:6 — “Is He not your Father, who created you…?”

  • Isaiah 63:16 — “You, O YHWH, are our Father…”

  • Isaiah 64:8 — “But now, O YHWH, you are our Father…”

  • Malachi 2:10 — “Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us?”

Notice what this means: “Father” is not introduced as a later “first person of the Trinity.” In the OT, the one God, YHWH Himself is the Father of Israel—God in the fullness of who He is, relating to His people covenantally.


2) The New Testament continues the same identity: the Father is “the only true God”

Jesus does not introduce “the Father” as merely one person alongside other divine persons. He identifies the Father as the only true God:

  • John 17:3 — “that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent.”

And the apostolic pattern matches that:

  • 1 Corinthians 8:6 — “for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things… and one Lord, Jesus Christ…”

  • Ephesians 4:6 — “one God and Father of all, who is over all…”

  • 1 Timothy 2:5 — “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus…”

That is not the language of “one God = three persons.” It is the language of one God = the Father, with Jesus distinguished as the sent Messiah and mediator.


3) Jesus’ “God” is the Father—and He places believers under the same God

After the resurrection Jesus says plainly:

  • John 20:17 — “I ascend to my Father and your Father, and my God and your God.”

This is devastating to the idea that “God” in the highest sense is a shared tri-personal being. Jesus doesn’t say “our God is the Trinity.” He says the Father is His God and their God.

Likewise:

  • John 8:54 — Jesus says Israel claims “He is our God” (referring to the Father), and Jesus does not correct the identity of that God; He distinguishes Himself as the one who honors Him.


4) Jesus reveals the Father: “seeing” the Son is “seeing” the Father by disclosure and indwelling

Jesus’ mission is consistently described as making God known, not introducing a second divine person who is God alongside the Father.

“I have manifested Your name”

  • John 17:6 — “I have manifested Your name…”
    The verb is φανερόω (phaneroō): to make visible, make clear, disclose.

This aligns with John’s opening thesis:

  • John 1:18 — “No one has seen God at any time… the Son… has made Him known.”

“He that hath seen me hath seen the Father”

  • John 14:9 — “He who has seen Me has seen the Father…”

But Jesus immediately explains how:

  • John 14:10 — “the Father abiding in Me does His works.”

So the “seeing” is not “you have seen a second divine person who is equally God.” It is: the Father is disclosed through the Son, because the Father indwells and works through Him.

That is representation and indwelling—not a redefinition of God from Father into “one person of a triune essence.”


5) “Manifested” in John 17 and “manifested” in 1 Timothy 3:16 are the same word-family

You asked for this specifically, and the Greek supports the conceptual link.

John 17:6 — “I have manifested” (ἐφανέρωσα)

John 17:6 uses ἐφανέρωσα (“I manifested / made known / disclosed”) from φανερόω.

1 Timothy 3:16 — “was manifested” (ἐφανερώθη)

1 Timothy 3:16 uses ἐφανερώθη (“was manifested / appeared / was revealed”)—same verb-family.

So the pattern is consistent:

  • In John 17, Jesus manifests the Father’s name

  • In 1 Timothy 3:16, the gospel mystery is manifestation in flesh

A necessary textual note (but it doesn’t rescue the Trinitarian “reduction”)

There is a major textual variant in 1 Timothy 3:16: some traditions read “God was manifested in flesh”, while many critical editions read “who was manifested in flesh.” BibleHub’s Greek text displays both lines of transmission (critical text “Ὃς…”, Byzantine/TR “θεὸς…”).

But either way, what is being described is the revelation/manifestation of God in the Messiah-event, not a demand that the Father be reduced to “one person of God.” The New Testament can say profound things like “God was in Christ” without collapsing the Father into a multi-person essence.


6) God was in Christ: the Father dwelt in the Son (temple logic)

Paul states the relationship with remarkable clarity:

  • 2 Corinthians 5:19 — “God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself…”

That is not “Christ was God reconciling the world to Himself.” It is: God (the Father) was in Christ, acting through the Messiah.

This is temple language, and John uses temple categories explicitly:

  • John 2:19–21 — Jesus speaks of “the temple of His body.”

  • This coheres perfectly with John 14:10: the Father abiding in Him.

So the apostolic framework is:

  • The Father is God in fullness

  • The Son is the living temple / image / agent through whom God is disclosed and at work


7) The Trinitarian move changes the Bible’s default meaning of “God”

Put simply:

  1. OT: “God” (Elohim) and “YHWH” refer to the one God, who is also called Father of Israel.

  2. NT: Jesus identifies the Father as the only true God (John 17:3) and calls Him my God and your God (John 20:17).

  3. NT: Jesus reveals God—He manifests the Father’s name (John 17:6), because the Father dwells in Him (John 14:10).

  4. NT: The gospel can be summarized as God in Christ (2 Cor 5:19).

But Trinitarianism effectively inserts a new controlling definition:

  • “God” = a tri-personal essence

  • “Father” = one person within that essence

it takes the Bible’s consistent identification—God is the Father—and recasts it so the Father is no longer simply “God” in the straightforward biblical way, but “a person of God.”


Extra verses that reinforce the same frame

  • John 5:30 — Jesus cannot do of himself; he seeks the Father’s will.

  • John 6:57 — “I live because of the Father.”

  • Acts 2:22 — Jesus is a man attested by God; God did works through him.

  • Acts 10:38 — “God anointed Jesus… God was with him.”

  • Hebrews 1:3 — the Son is the radiance and exact representation (representation ≠ identity).

  • Revelation 3:12 — the risen Christ repeatedly says “my God.”

All of these naturally read as: one God, the Father, made known and active through His Messiah.

Conclusion: Recovering the Bible’s Native God-Language

What emerges from the biblical data is not a denial of Christ’s glory, but a recovery of Scripture’s own grammar about God.

From beginning to end, the Bible speaks with remarkable consistency:

  • The one God is YHWH

  • This one God is called Father

  • Jesus is the Messiah sent by God

  • God is made known, revealed, and at work in and through His Son

The problem addressed in this post is not that Trinitarian theology tries to honor the Son—it is that, in doing so, it redefines “God” itself. Where Scripture overwhelmingly uses “God” to mean the Father, later Trinitarian framing turns “God” into an abstract essence shared by three persons, thereby reducing the Father from being simply God to being merely one person of God.

That move is not demanded by the text. It is imposed upon it.

The New Testament does not present Jesus as a co-equal redefinition of who God is, but as the one through whom God is revealed. Jesus manifests the Father’s name, does the Father’s works, speaks the Father’s words, and calls the Father His God. God is not displaced or divided; He is disclosed. The Father remains the one true God, now made known through His Messiah by indwelling, agency, and representation.

In short, the apostolic proclamation is not “God is three persons”, but:

God was in Christ, reconciling the world to Himself.

When that simple, biblical framework is allowed to stand, the text reads naturally, coherently, and without contradiction. The Father is not diminished, the Son is not denigrated, and Scripture is permitted to define its own terms.

What is lost in the Trinitarian “reduction of the Father” is not orthodoxy—but the Bible’s own way of speaking about the one God whom Jesus reveals, worships, obeys, and calls “my God and your God.”

f you liked this study please subscribe here

You can buy my books on Amazon there is a link here 

Help me keep this site free for all. Join our Patreon membershiphere


0 Comments

Leave a Reply