Perfect — you’ve got it.
Here’s the final, publication-ready version, identical to the one you approved but with the Middle English stage correctly inserted into §3 (The Real Etymology of “Jesus”).
Everything else remains exactly the same.

Does the Name “Jesus” Mean “Earth-Pig”?

Introduction

A popular claim circulated by some critics—both non-Christians and certain professing Christians—is that the name “Jesus” supposedly means “Earth-Pig.”
This assertion is most often used by groups who insist that one must only use the “Hebrew name” of the Messiah (usually Yahusha or Yeshua) and that the English name Jesus is “pagan.”

The reasoning behind the “Earth-Pig” claim runs as follows:

“In Latin, Jesus means Earth-Pig.
‘Je’ (or Ge) = Earth, and ‘Sus’ = Pig, therefore Jesus = Earth-Pig.”

At first glance, this may appear plausible to those unfamiliar with ancient languages. However, even the most basic linguistic analysis shows that the claim is entirely false.

1. There Is No Latin Word “Je”

The first and most obvious problem is that there is no Latin word “Je.”
In fact, Latin has no native words beginning with “Je–” because the letter “J” did not exist in classical Latin—it is a later medieval development of the letter “I.”

Nor is there any Latin word containing the letters je that carries the meaning “earth.”
The Latin for earth is terra, and in Greek it is gē (γη)—the latter being the source of our prefix geo- (as in geography).
Thus, from the very outset, the claim collapses: Je ≠ Earth.

2. The Form “Jesus” in Latin

The Latin form of the name is Iesus, not “Gesus.”
The English Jesus is a later transliteration of the Latin Iesus (the letter J was introduced to distinguish the consonantal I sound).

Therefore, it is linguistically invalid to divide Jesus into “Ge-sus.”
That form never existed in Latin, Greek, or any related language.

3. The Real Etymology of “Jesus”

The etymological chain is well-established:

Hebrew: יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšûaʿ) → Greek: Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) → Latin: Iesus → Middle English: Ihesus / Iesus → Modern English: Jesus.

Each step in that chain represents transliteration, not translation.
In early and Middle English manuscripts, before the letter J was introduced, the name appeared as Ihesus or Iesus—pronounced with a Y sound (“Yeh-sus”).
Only in the sixteenth century did printers adopt J as a distinct consonant form of I, producing the familiar spelling Jesus.

The name ultimately derives from the Hebrew Yehoshuaʿ (יְהוֹשׁוּעַ), meaning “Yahweh is salvation.”
That is the same name rendered Joshua in the Old Testament.

Thus, Jesus means “Yahweh saves,” not “Earth-Pig.”

4. Why the “Ge-sus” Argument Fails Linguistically

A common version of the claim insists:

“In Latin, ge means earth and sus means pig, therefore Ge-sus means Earth-Pig.”

While ge (γη) does mean “earth” in Greek, not Latin, and sus indeed means “pig” in Latin, combining one Greek morpheme and one Latin morpheme to define a name that is neither Greek nor Latin is linguistically absurd.
Languages do not operate by mixing random syllables across linguistic families and retrofitting meaning.

Furthermore, Jesus is not composed of the morphemes ge + sus in any ancient language; it is a proper name transliterated through Greek and Latin from Hebrew.

5. Translation vs. Transliteration

The argument also reveals a misunderstanding of how translation works.
Translation conveys meaning between languages; transliteration conveys pronunciation.

You cannot take a transliteration in one language, then divide it into pieces that look like words in another language, and claim that the meaning of those other words defines the transliteration.

To illustrate:

The English word “plot” means “a secret plan” or “the storyline of a narrative.”
In Czech, however, “plot” means “a fence.”

It would be incorrect to argue that an English speaker saying “plot” actually means “fence” simply because the same sequence of letters happens to mean that in Czech.
The same linguistic fallacy occurs when people claim Jesus = Ge + sus (“earth + pig”).

6. Historical Development of the Name

1. Hebrew: יֵשׁוּעַ (Yēšûaʿ) — “Yahweh saves.”

2. Aramaic/Greek: Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous) — the standard Greek form used in the New Testament.

3. Latin: Iesus — direct transliteration of the Greek.

4. Middle English: Ihesus / Iesus — pre-J spelling used in Wycliffe’s 14th-century Bible.

5. Modern English: Jesus — emerging in the 16th century after the adoption of J as a distinct consonant.

At no point does the name derive from words meaning earth or pig.

7. Conclusion

The claim that the name Jesus means “Earth-Pig” is linguistically and historically baseless.
It rests on:

• A nonexistent Latin word (“Je”),

• A misuse of Greek and Latin roots, and

• A confusion between transliteration and translation.

The name Jesus comes from the Hebrew Yehoshuaʿ / Yeshuaʿ, meaning “Yahweh is salvation.”
It expresses the central message of the Gospel, not a pagan or insulting idea.

To suggest otherwise demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of both ancient languages and the process of translation.
In short: Jesus does not—and never did—mean “Earth-Pig.”

References (illustrative)

1. Oxford Latin Dictionary (OLD), s.v. terra, sus.

2. LSJ Greek Lexicon, s.v. γη (gē).

3. BDAG Greek Lexicon, s.v. Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous).

4. Brown–Driver–Briggs Hebrew Lexicon, s.v. יְהוֹשׁוּעַ (Yehoshuaʿ).

5. Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, Greek–English Lexicon, rev. Jones (Oxford, 1996).

6. Raymond Brown, The Birth of the Messiah, 2nd ed. (Doubleday, 1993).